• Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Services
    • Upholding Marriage
      • Catholic “Prenup”
      • Ask Church to Stop Breakup
      • For Divorce Defendant (local Ohio)
      • For Annulment Defendant
    • Support Groups for Spouses
    • Gift of Self (book)
    • Approved Reconciliation Experts
    • Personalized Assistance
  • Research
    • Catholic “Divorce”
    • Catholic Annulment
    • Ohio Law
    • U.S. Constitution
  • Blog
    • Entreaties
  • Video/Audio
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Services
    • Upholding Marriage
      • Catholic “Prenup”
      • Ask Church to Stop Breakup
      • For Divorce Defendant (local Ohio)
      • For Annulment Defendant
    • Support Groups for Spouses
    • Gift of Self (book)
    • Approved Reconciliation Experts
    • Personalized Assistance
  • Research
    • Catholic “Divorce”
    • Catholic Annulment
    • Ohio Law
    • U.S. Constitution
  • Blog
    • Entreaties
  • Video/Audio
  • Shop
  • Donate
Woman in U.S. Complains to Highest Catholic Court in the World

Woman in U.S. Complains to Highest Catholic Court in the World

  • Posted by Mary's Advocates
  • On September 19, 2018
  • 4 Comments

Archdiocese Denies her Right of Due Process

Mary’s Advocates is publicizing a woman’s complaint to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura where she gives evidence of denial of due process rights in Catholic annulment cases.  Her identity is kept confidential and we’ll call her Jane. From both Jane’s case, and the instructions published on the diocesan website, Jane describes the unfair disadvantage experienced by any party defending against accusations that one’s marriage is invalid. According to the most recent public statistics, 100% of the marriages judged by the diocese were invalid.

In past decades, both Pope Benedict the XVI and Saint Pope John Paul II have warned against abusing the annulment process with psychological grounds to illicitly claim marriages are invalid. To do so is a “violence to the truth and undermining thereby the only solid foundation which can support personal, marital, and social life” (JP2 1990).  Cardinal Raymond Burke, former head of the Signatura (2008-2014), clearly implies that some canon lawyers who are unjust, and not well-prepared, conduct annulment cases.

Faithful spouses, like Jane, who defend the validity of their marriage, hope the Church would start instructing negligent spouses of their obligations to keep their marriage promises and work on being half-decent spouses. In over half the United States, annulments are issued for virtually every petitioner who asks. Jane wrote, “These petitioners seemed to be too eager to slaughter their sacrament of marriage without second thoughts about the horrific effects on their salvation and their children. The results of the process will cut loose and destroy all possibilities of healings and rebinding of the family.”

Legal due process principles require that the accused party must be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.  For example, if Jane’s neighbor accused Jane of aggravated assault, he’d have to tell the police and prosecuting attorney his general description of what and when it happened.  Jane has the right to know the law about aggravated assault and know, in general, the specifics about the situation of the alleged crime. If, instead, Jane was required to defend herself against charges of aggravated assault and was never told the date of the alleged crime and the specifics, defense would be impossible. Or worse yet, if Jane prepared for trial to defend herself against specific accusations of aggravated assault, but then was surprised to find out that the trial was all about her allegedly embezzling money, or some other unrelated crime, that would also be unjust.

In both civil, criminal, and Catholic canon law, if the person raising the complaint doesn’t describe the nature of the accusation, the judge is supposed to throw the case out. The party (or lawyer) wanting court intervention has to show the judge reasons, based in alleged facts, for a trial.  In Jane’s case, the diocesan Tribunal had their trial without ever showing Jane the description of the general alleged facts upon which her husband was relying to support his accusation for the reason the judges used.  Canon law requires the Tribunal to give this description to Jane before collecting any evidence. The judges decided that Jane was the cause of the invalidity of marriage for the psychological ground, canon 1095.2. This is the same ground about which previous Popes have warned against abuses.

In addition, Jane complained about other illegal practices of her local tribunal; she pointed out that a judge is not supposed to start collecting evidence until after the defendant has seen the summary of the alleged facts supporting the accusation, and not until after the judge tells the parties the law-based basis for annulment being investigated. See Jane’s complaint about diocesan procedures to the Signatura, and about her individual marriage to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota (here).

The non-profit organization Mary’s Advocate’s publicizes the canon law for upholding the right of defendants and proposes that tribunals use electronic document management to ensure due process rights are protected.  Furthermore, Mary’s Advocates shows those being reluctantly divorced how to petition the bishop to try to stop marriage break-up and facilitate reconciliation.

 

4 Comments

A concerned catholic
  • Aug 19 2020
  • Reply
Amen Sister. I wholeheartedly agree with you. We need not idly sit back and allow this sexual abuse scandal to go unnoticed. We need to stand up and fight until this abuse and coverup in the church is removed. Please see the following link with additional info on the hierarchy abuse in the Catholic Church. Is the Hierarchy Really Serious About the Abuse Crisis? - Crisis Magazine https://www.crisismagazine.com/2019/is-the-hierarchy-really-serious-about-the-abuse-crisis
John Doe
  • Dec 18 2018
  • Reply
I had appealed the illegal process of the Boston Tribunal. I was trying to preserve my marriage in the church. My ex-wife had asked for the annulment. It took 3 years and lots of money. The Roman Rota declared the approval of the 2nd instance null and void. Now, my case is sitting at the Roman Rota waiting to see if they will even accept it, for the 2nd instance. the annulment process is now entering it's 6th year I also have a request in at the Signatura to void the Boston's original decision of the 1st instance, based on fraud an other irregularities. In the meantime, my ex-wife alledgedly got remarried in a catholic ceremony. Also, my Roman advocate that I had employed and paid for 3 years, has quit, claiming illness. She was in Italy. Anyways, I need a new advocate. Are there any honest ones, (with integrity), in the Boston area that you may know of? Please do not publish my name or email address.
Onlinepharmacybusinessmodel
  • Sep 20 2018
  • Reply
zandru : Have we ever heard, or read, anything about “divorce”? Yes, they''ve said on the show numerous times that a marriage is not official if it''s not consummated. Divorce does not exist in the show, but annulment does, at least if you belong to the Faith of the Seven. An annulment can be requested for a number of reasons, one of which being an unconsummated marriage.
    Mary's Advocates
    • Sep 21 2018
    • Reply
    Hi Zandru, To whom are you directing your questions? Yes, I've ready very much about divorce. On what show did you hear someone say numerous times that marriage is not official if it is not consummated? In the Catholic tradition and Code of Canon Law, such attempted marriages are decided to be invalid. DISPENSATION OF A MARRIAGE RATUM ET NON CONSUMMATUM. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P6R.HTM

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Sign up for Newsletter

What is Pope Francis talking about?

Previous thumb

Have Annulments Become “Catholic Divorce”?

Next thumb
Scroll
©Mary's Advocates. 501(c)(3) nonprofit
Please Help Spread the Word

To uphold Marriage, we need your help. $5150 is total monthly goal regularly.

Thank You,
Bai Macfarlane, Mary’s Advocates. We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit.