Save James – Family Courts are Dangerous
- Posted by Mary's Advocates
- On October 25, 2019
The civil courts should never be empowered to take kids from decent Dad in the first place.
In Dallas Texas an expensive family court case decided custody as a Dad complained that his X-wife should not be allowed to force their 7-year old son to transition to a girl by administering puberty blockers and castrating him in coming years. The parents were married, but are not anymore. Friends of the father, Jeff Youngers, started the “Save James” campaign over a year ago.
Lifesite News covered the court case and Monday a jury decided the Mom should have full decision making power. The Judge issued the court order Thursday that wasn’t as bad for the Dad and for James (7 year old son). At least for now, Mom will not be allowed to give their son puberty inhabiting drugs. A previous court-order was removed that forbid Dad to teach his son that he’s a boy.
Family Courts Are Dangerous
This case illustrates that family courts cannot be allowed to decide the obligations of husband and wife toward each other and their children. It is too dangerous and subjective. Many divorce defendants do not have the wherewithal and resources that Jeff Youngers was able to muster. In every divorce case, when one parent files for divorce and a custody determination, the state purports to have power over every aspect of children’s lives and full control over all parenting decisions. Divorce lawyers know that half decent parents will give everything they have, and more, to uphold their right to parent their own children.
Bai Macfarlane showing clips from LifeSite News story.
For anyone who married in a bible-believing church’s ceremony (including Catholics) an enormous part of marriage involves the right and responsibility to live with and raise one’s own children. When a no-fault divorce Defendant is cited, those rights are all threatened. If the Defendant doesn’t do whatever the court wants, the government will use police force to take children away from the Defendant. Jeff was ordered not to teach his son that he was a boy. He paid tens of thousands of dollars to try to get that changed.
Divorce officials tell Defendants to refrain from teaching their children that divorce is immoral or wrong. I’ve seen it.
In the video excerpt that I showed above, Jeff Younger explains how the courts tried to suppress him. Most fathers “go along to get along; they get scared; they run out of money.” In Jeff’s 10 minute interview HERE, he explains that courts make a winning parent and a losing parent. The state needs the loser so they can charge the loser child support and then the state can get the US Federal Government Title 4-D reward. The Federal government gives matching funds to the state for every child support order and Texas is awarded 3/4 of a billion dollars, says Jeff.
His interview was recorded after the jury voted that Dad has no power to stop his son’s castration or drug-induced transition to a girl. He said that in the Texas he grew up in, if a parent said she was going to cut off her son’s pe_nis, the child would be taken away from that parent and given to the other. After the interview was recorded, the Judge made her ruling and put a gag order on Jeff so he is not allowed to talk to the press. The Judge gave Jeff power to stop the puberty blockers and surgical castration.
CBS Channel 11 in Dallas showed video of Judge Cooks’ ruling in which she said the Jeff Youngers Younger raised approximately $139,000 in donations in support of his cause.”