• Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Services
    • Upholding Marriage
      • Catholic “Prenup”
      • Ask Church to Stop Breakup
      • For Divorce Defendant (local Ohio)
      • For Annulment Defendant
    • Support Groups for Spouses
    • Gift of Self (book)
    • Approved Reconciliation Experts
    • Personalized Assistance
  • Research
    • Catholic “Divorce”
    • Catholic Annulment
    • Ohio Law
    • U.S. Constitution
  • Blog
    • Entreaties
  • Video/Audio
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Services
    • Upholding Marriage
      • Catholic “Prenup”
      • Ask Church to Stop Breakup
      • For Divorce Defendant (local Ohio)
      • For Annulment Defendant
    • Support Groups for Spouses
    • Gift of Self (book)
    • Approved Reconciliation Experts
    • Personalized Assistance
  • Research
    • Catholic “Divorce”
    • Catholic Annulment
    • Ohio Law
    • U.S. Constitution
  • Blog
    • Entreaties
  • Video/Audio
  • Shop
  • Donate

Lack of Discretion, Cardinal Burke, Year 1985

  • Posted by Mary's Advocates
  • On January 16, 2019
  • 0 Comments

Post Navigation Path:  / Research / Catholic Annulment / Sources Cited

Open PDF

20 sheets (File size 347 KB)

Burke, Raymond L.
“Lack of Discretion of Judgment: Canonical Doctrine and Legislation.”
Mary’s Advocates. 15 Jan. 2019
<https://marysadvocates.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/01/RaymondBurkeDiscretion_1985.pdf>

Previously Published
Burke, Raymond L.
“Lack of Discretion of Judgment: Canonical Doctrine and Legislation.”
45 Jurist 171 (1985)

Published with November 24, 2017 permission from Cardinal Raymond Burke.

Page 23
From the discussions of the Pontifical Commission for the Revision of the Code of Canon Law, it is clear that the canon is intended to end the silence and to define the grounds as an incapacity to give consent. In the official publication of the commission it is reported:

Even if the principles regarding the incapacity of giving valid marriage consent are contained implicitly in the law in force, it was seen as advantageous that the same be expressed more distinctly and clearly in the new law.

The juridical qualification of the ground is incapacity. The canon is, then, a kind of general norm for the whole section on marriage consent; it establishes what is the requisite capacity to give marriage consent. From the discussions it is also clear that the ground is not a species of the ground of ignorance but rather a separate ground based on the disturbance of the intellect and will due to mental illness.

Outline of Article

I. Possible Confusions Regarding The Lack of Discretion of Judgment . . p. 4
…..A. Confusion About the Nature of the Grounds . . p. 5
…..B. Terminological Confusion . . p. 8
…..…..1. Within Canonical Tradition . . p. 8
…..…..2. Between Canon Law and Psychiatry . . p. 12
…..C. Confusion About Marriage Law Itself . . p. 13
II. The Law Concerning Lack of Discretion of Judgment . . p. 15
…..A. Before the 1917 Code . . p. 15
…..B. The 1917 Code . . p. 17
…..C. The 1983 Code . . p. 22
III. Canonical Doctrine Concerning Lack of Discretion of Judgment . . p. 26
…..A. Saint Thomas Aquinas . . . p. 26
…..B. Thomas Sanchez . . p. 29
…..C. Contemporary Presentations . . p. 33
IV. CONCLUSION . . p. 39

 

0 Comments

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Sign up for Newsletter

No-Fault Divorce Challenged in Nebraska Court

Previous thumb

Twisting Divorce Teaching in Diocese of Lincoln

Next thumb
Scroll
©Mary's Advocates. 501(c)(3) nonprofit
Please Help Spread the Word

To uphold Marriage, we need your help. $5150 is total monthly goal regularly.

Thank You,
Bai Macfarlane, Mary’s Advocates. We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit.