• Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Resources
    • True Marriage Proclamation
    • Defending Marriage
      • Petition Bishop (Vindicate Rights)
      • Invoke Constitution
      • Pro-Families Ohio
    • Support Network
    • Gift of Self (book)
    • Reconciliation Experts
  • Research
    • Catholic “Divorce”
    • Catholic Annulment
    • U.S. Constitution
    • Ohio Law
  • Blog
    • Entreaties
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Resources
    • True Marriage Proclamation
    • Defending Marriage
      • Petition Bishop (Vindicate Rights)
      • Invoke Constitution
      • Pro-Families Ohio
    • Support Network
    • Gift of Self (book)
    • Reconciliation Experts
  • Research
    • Catholic “Divorce”
    • Catholic Annulment
    • U.S. Constitution
    • Ohio Law
  • Blog
    • Entreaties
  • Shop
  • Donate
Exposing Annulment Corruption

Exposing Annulment Corruption

  • Posted by Mary's Advocates
  • On April 25, 2020

by Bai Macfarlane
Something is wrong with the many annulments being granted by Catholic tribunals in the United States. Mary’s Advocates is helping defendants drain the swamp.

During the past several weeks, I’ve helped defendants in two different dioceses bring complaints to the Holy See exposing negligence which appears systemic in their tribunal. The diocesan websites and form-letters to defendants show the tribunals are not upholding the rights of defense for those who believe that their marriages are valid.  I show defendants how to send their paper-record to offices in the Holy See responsible for overseeing Tribunals throughout the world: The Supreme Tribunal of the Signatura and the Roman Rota.

Most recently, I showed a defendant how he could ask the Signatura to study the vigilance of the tribunal and issue precepts (see excerpts here).  In the photo, I’m showing his exhibits. Among other things, he complained that tribunal personnel keep hidden from defendants the essence of the accusation being weighed by the judge. The most commonly used ground for annulment used by U.S. tribunals is canon 1095 §2, which actually means that one party had a serious psychic anomaly or grave psychopathology at the time of their wedding.* Instead of informing defendants of the essence of what is being weighed, the tribunal personnel provide incorrect information which is misleading, erroneous, and even deceptive. Had the husband known the principle question being investigated (i.e. someone’s mental illness), he would have participated much differently.

He was aggrieved by a judgement from an influential canon lawyer priest who got a doctorate in canon law in 1981. This was a tumultuous time for canon law because everyone knew that the canon law was being reorganized as a result of recommendations stemming from Vatican II.  Those wanting the Church to be lax were hoping that the new canon law would change the longstanding grounds for annulment.

Cardinal Raymond Burke teaches about “The Relation between the Apostolic Signatura and the Particular Churches.” About the practices of US Tribunals from 1971 to 1983, Cardinal Burke said, “the poor quality of many first instance sentences examined by the Signatura, together with the evident lack of any serious review on the part of some appellate tribunals, demonstrated the grave damage done to the process of declaration of nullity of marriage by the effective omission of the second instance during those years” [Source: Burke, Cardinal Raymond L.. “The Relation between the Apostolic Signatura and the Particular Churches.” The Jurist 74 (2014): 31-57. pg. 55]

Saint Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, and Cardinal Raymond Burke cautioned against tribunals being lax. Ignatius Press described abuses in Homiletic and Pastoral Review in 1995, 2001,  and 2005.  More recently, Fr. David Nix (Aug 29, 2017) and Professor Anthony Esolen (June 19, 2020) voiced concerns. Catholic Author, Leila Miller says that “among our clergy and counselors, there is a near-universal ‘divorce, annul, and move on’” mindset.  Miller’s most recent book, ’Impossible’ Marriages Redeemed: They Didn’t End the Story in the Middle, tells the stories of dozens of couples who overcame marriage crises and provided an intact family for their children.  One of her contributors wrote,

Over the years, I consulted with up to six different priests while going through a tough time in our marriage. Each one said I had grounds for an annulment, and that he would help me through the process. The last time I consulted a priest was about 15 years ago, and this one said the same thing. I told him I did not want a divorce or an annulment, but rather to stay married and find meaning in my situation. He said that in his experience of witnessing marriages in an ongoing crisis like mine, healing was impossible.

Those who want to uphold the validity of their marriage are in a difficult situation if they are in a diocese that accepts every petition and issues annulments in 100% of their decisions.  The Canon Law Society of America shows that over one third of the reporting tribunals grant annulments in every case. Find 2016 data here that also shows most dioceses adjudicate the case of every petitioner.  Of those, here is a sampling of the dioceses which grant the highest number of annulments.

Diocese In favor of the Bond In favor of nullity
Cleveland 1 247
Rockville Centre 0 227
Wichita 2 187
Raleigh 0 168
Kansas City in Kansas 1 159
Boston 1 157
Louisville 0 137
Columbus 3 133

Canon law requires a tribunal to offer free advocates to parties. An advocate is supposed to have a doctorate in canon law or be a recognized expert in canon law.  “[T]he tribunal is bound by the obligation to provide that each spouse is able to defend his rights with the help of a competent person, most especially when it concerns causes of a special difficulty” (D.C. art. 101 §1). However, if the Tribunal is overseen by a canon lawyer judge from the era in which there were poor quality of sentences issued, it is imaginable that the tribunal cannot provide an advocate who is fastidious about correctly protecting the rights of a defendant who intends to uphold the validity of his marriage. Some tribunals have all the day-to-day correspondence with parties managed by laypeople who only know what they were taught by their predecessors.

Unlike tax accountants or plumbers, independent canon law experts are not readily available for hire. Degreed canon lawyers that are employed full time to work for one diocese might not be available for hire to challenge the practice of another diocese. I’m a self-studied expert in canon law, and those helped by the resources of Mary’s Advocates say they are grateful to find us. I wonder if there is a mentality of circling of the wagons amongst the canon lawyers employed by dioceses that are happy with the status quo.

* NOTE
Saint Pope John Paul II, Address to the Roman Rota: 25 January 1988, “Bearing in mind that only the most severe forms of psychopathology impair substantially the freedom of the individual;” 5 February 1987, “The hypothesis of real incapacity is to be considered only when an anomaly of a serious nature is present, which, however it may be defined, must substantially vitiate the capacity of the individual to understand and/or to will.”

 5

4 Comments

Patsy Koenig
  • Jun 25 2020
  • Reply
To stop the misuse of Canon 1095, the Canon Law itself needs to be re-written. That is, the "loose canon 1095" needs tighter language.
Al
  • Apr 28 2020
  • Reply
Grave lack of discernment is often used too. King Henry VIII would have gotten an annulment or two today (he was married 6 times - divorced 2 wives, beheaded 2 wives, one died naturally, and was married to 6th when he died). Bottom line, this is another weapon against marriage and family. Kids are really hurt when parents remarry as demonstrated in Primal Loss by Leila Miller. It affects my kids.
Lisa Anderson
  • Apr 25 2020
  • Reply
Just to clarify advocates have been trained in this one aspect of Canon law. They are not Canon Lawyers or “experts” in Canon Law in general.
    Mary's Advocates
    • Apr 28 2020
    • Reply
    Hi Lisa,
    Thanks for the observation.

    The law itself delimits who can serve in the role of "advocate." If an advocate is RECOMMENDED to a defendant in an annulment case by the Assistant Director of the Tribunal, I imagine the Tribunal would require the advocate to be expert in the law about annulment procedure and grounds for annulment. In the defendant's complaint to the Signatura, he provided proof that the advocate was neither.

    See Dignitas Connubii, Art. 105 – § 1.
    The procurator and advocate must be of good reputation; in addition the advocate must be a Catholic, unless the Bishop Moderator allows otherwise, and a doctor in canon law, or otherwise truly expert, and approved by the same Bishop (cf. can. 1483).

    See Canon 1483.
    Can. 1483 The procurator and advocate must have attained their majority and be of good repute. The advocate is also to be a catholic unless the diocesan Bishop permits otherwise, a doctor in canon law or otherwise well qualified, and approved by the same Bishop.

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Sign up for Newsletter

“Impossible” Marriages Redeemed

Previous thumb

Mary Undoer of Knots - Inspired by Couple Saved from Divorce

Next thumb
Scroll
© 2020 Mary's Advocates Contact: ma.defending@marysadvocates.org
Please Help Spread the Word

To uphold Marriage, we need your help. $5000 is total monthly goal regularly.

Thank You,
Bai Macfarlane, Mary’s Advocates. We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit.