[…]was aware that I was videotaping it, and the video was my work. I give permission to EVERYONE to download it and repost it everywhere and to share it with others–including Texas representatives and senators. In my opinion, they should NOT have started this fight. This is the video by […]
[…]spouses to “move on” and find a new partner because outsiders don’t trust God, are uncomfortable with their friend experiencing pain, want the pain to stop. Two Mary’s Advocate’s offers resources to make marriage a more enforceable contract in contrast to no-fault divorce. The essential elements that one must understand, […]
[…]same today as 1000 years ago. In other words, what kind of mutual help is required of both husband and wife who were 1890’s Oklahoma settlers, 8th century Frankish aristocrats, and present day rural Guinea Africans? It is obvious that the kinds of help each offered the other varied greatly. […]
[…]in age from three to eight-years-old, and his wife had been able to be a stay-at-home mom with a comfortable standard of living. They married in the Orthodox Christian tradition, where the Husband knows that if he committed adultery or was a crazed abuser, he would forfeit his right to […]
[…]of her life (see Rite of Marriage). Catholic marriage entails fault-based grounds for separation and for invalidity (i.e. annulment). The appeal brief says the Nebraska statute is unconstitutional and the court made multiple errors: denying the husband’s motion to dismiss the case, finding that the marriage was irretrievably broken, dividing property, […]
[…]I find there is much talk about grounds for annulment, even in overly simplistic inaccurate ways. For example, immaturity in a general way is not a ground for annulment (see here), though some people think it is. There is too little discussion identifying marital abandonment, describing the legitimate grounds for […]